j_cheney: (Default)
[personal profile] j_cheney
"One absurdly precise study estimates that 28 percent of prominent scientists, 60 percent of composers, 73 percent of painters, 77 percent of novelists, and an astonishing 87 percent of poets have shown some degree of mental disturbance." 1

Yes, it seems to imply that poets are crazier than novelists.

 
I'm going to be working on the (revamped) outline for The White Queen for days. I wrote the rough draft using an outline done on index cards, when then had to be modified to add a POV character. Looking at it now, I'm probably going to cut 2 POV characters with the possible exception of a couple of random scenes where no one else is around. The flow isn't as smooth as I'd like, either, so I'll have to work on that.

I keep saying that I'm going to outline better before I start the first draft. Perhaps next novel....
______________
1) From The Agile Gene by Matt Ridley, relating the findings of DK Simonton in his article "The Origins of Genius" in the Oxford University Press, 2003. (Taken from his chapter on schizophrenia, wherein he hypothesizes reasons why the genetic tendency for that disorder doesn't die out of the species (thereby implying that it must be of benefit somehow). It's a very complicated argument.)

Date: 2007-07-17 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tchernabyelo.livejournal.com
I thought it was a fairly standard argument (well, within the canon of evolutionary science) that any gene which has apparently "negative" survival effects yet remains comparatively widespread must have "positive" surivival effects as well, even if they may not be obvious. There are certainly other examples of this (e.g. the link between sickle-cell anemia and increased resistance to malaria).

There's long been an empirical link between creativity and madness (hey, even the Greeks had spotted it). The intriguing thing is whether creativity is a survival trait at an individual level, if the "creation" can then be used by other members of society and they no longer need the creator. The society needs creativity, but if it doesn't benefit the individual, then it might die out. Arguably, this is why social structures have grown up which protect the creative - story-tellers and artists are as old as recorded history, after all (indeed, they ARE recorded history).

Hmmm

Date: 2007-07-17 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] namelessarchon.livejournal.com
I love that argument!

Date: 2007-07-17 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j-cheney.livejournal.com
More or less the argument he's making. The genes that predict schizophrenia run evenly across all cultures, making it a very old genetic tendency... It's an interesting read.

Date: 2007-07-18 12:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melissajm.livejournal.com
I was fascinated that creative thinkers tend to score between Normal and Pathological on the psychosis scale of the MMPI.

Makes sense. Creativity is basically controlled loosening of associations.

Profile

j_cheney: (Default)
J. Kathleen Cheney

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 10:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios