Ultraviolet
Jul. 8th, 2007 06:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last night
displaced_texan and I finished watching Ultraviolet, a 1998ish British miniseries. Excellent viewing. We've decided it's a keeper. (This is not the Milla Jovovich movie, folks)
I got a nice write-up from
chris_gerrib, who now no longer owes me a coke. He notes that the story is between Fantasy and Science Fiction, which pleases me immensely. The divide between F & SF seems set in concrete, but I often write between. That puts me in a weird spot...
I have heard the term 'science fantasy' before, but I don't know that I've ever seen a good definition for that.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I got a nice write-up from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I have heard the term 'science fantasy' before, but I don't know that I've ever seen a good definition for that.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 12:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 11:16 am (UTC)I've never heard the term science fantasy. It's intersting. If you come up with a better word, and why shouldn't you be the one to start a new trend, let me know.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 09:49 pm (UTC)The line between "fantasy" and "science fiction" isn't so much a line as a continuum. At the ends of the continuum (Lord of the Rings) it's real obvious. Stuff in the middle? Not so much. Also, the ends of the continuum keep moving. For example: in the '50s and '60s, there was a lot of SF that assumed psychic powers, like ESP and such. Now that same concept would lean more to fantasy.
(no subject)
From: